Subscription details

Subscribe to RipeTrade, details here!

Sunday, November 30, 2008

S&P 500 a potential short


The S&P futures are currently overbought and the short term pattern is bearish if the S&P futures gap open above Fridays high 896. Above you will find the performance results of the current pattern based on 1 contract trades since 1982.
If Open > 896 then SS @ open
Exit 1st profitable open or 2% stop loss

Out of the 2 short term trades that have hit since we started this blog, we lost17 pts on November 18th, but made 52 pts on the win from October 28th Net, the short term system is up 32pts in 2 trades.

Stock market trading model Update


The S&P Model is flat and in cash. This model will potentially get short the S&P at the close tomorrow Monday December 1st, if the VIX low is greater than 50.5 during the day tomorrow.

The NASDAQ model is short as of the close on Friday November 28th.

Thursday, November 27, 2008

Stock market trading model Update


The S&P Model is flat and in cash. This model will potentially get short the S&P at the close tomorrow November 28th, if the VIX low is greater than 54.62 during the day tomorrow.

The NASDAQ model is flat and in cash. This model will get short at the close tomorrow November 28th if the VXN stays above 54.76 during the day tomorrow, or if the VXN closes above the VXN open tomorrow or if the VXN closes greater than 55.26.

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Happy Thanksgiving


Thanks for reading.

Growth at a reasonable price in health care - Mylan MYL

Growth at a reasonable price in healthcare – Mylan on the comeback trail.
By Allen Phatimer RipeTrade contributor and AlphaTimer co-founder

Thinking about ideas that are somewhat countercyclical in nature but also have a good chance of support from industry specific trends and/or company specific dynamics which can yield cash flow and earnings acceleration lead to me like Mylan (MYL). I view this as an out of favor name in an out of favor sector; a contrarian idea which would effectively surprise positively if they simply met guidance or a consensus) of non-belief) below management's guidance. Expectations are very low in my opinion, and its understandable given the history; but Mylan suddenly appears positioned to beat expectations and gets no credit for that prospect. Management sounds very confident regarding their financial prospects yet the street says single digit forward multiple until Mylan shows us the money.

The history for those of you that don't know is that a couple of years ago the company had improving new product momentum, was valued cheaply and primed to fly as they blew out estimates for the first time in a while. Instead of leaving well enough alone, they did a pharmaceutical ingredient co. acquisition which made sense strategically and was bought at an arguably fair price but then quickly got into a bidding war for Merck KG's generic drug business. Merck KG was more than twice their size and also made sense from a longer run strategic perspective as it gave MYL access to new faster growing markets in Europe and Asia and effectively would make them a global player which would leverage the new ingredients, lower cost manufacturing capacity and distribution.

It could have been brilliant; if only Mylan didn't over pay. As it turned out Mylan got into a biding war with all the big global generic guys AND about 4 private equity investors. The bidding got too rich for the publicly traded companies involved and private equity investors gave up shortly thereafter. MYL won and went from a company trading at 9 times earnings with sales momentum and operating leverage positioned to beat estimates for the first time in years, to one paying a big premium and diluting the hell out of its shareholders as they financed the deal (with stock and debt) after they stock went down significantly.

The company has since put up weak results and guided down a couple of times but now guides to significant improvement which no one seems to believe. That now appears poised to change. Earnings out a couple of weeks ago look much better than expected and MYL reaffirmed guidance for both 2009 and 2010. Sales, margins and net income were substantially better than expected and synergy potential still lies ahead of them. Management said they've realized $100M of the $300M in synergies they plan and expressed confidence that they achieve their target of $300M by year end 2010.

Furthermore, the co. detailed the pipeline; which includes 93 ANDAs related to about $65B in branded sales of which 22 are potential first to file opportunities related to roughly $12B in branded sales. First to file opportunities are a boon to generics, where companies have 180 day exclusivity and not only price much higher than competitors that join the fray on day 181; but also work to cement sales relationships in these new products before competition arrives. The pipeline is key because new product momentum is what will offset pricing pressure which is a fact of life for generics.

In the quarter recently reported Mylan posted better sales and margins, mainly due to a improved mix of higher margin U.S. sales which more than offset pricing pressure in Europe and to a lesser extent Asia. Mylan is very well positioned on this front; and the share price gets no credit for this in my opinion.

Another key part of the investment case is that utilization increases at the same time that a lot more drugs go off patent in the next 3 years. In 2009, 2010 and 2011, more branded drugs will lose patent protection than ever before. And as more people across the globe have access to cheaper medicines and payers and governments push moves to generic alternatives to cut costs, utilization can also grow. So this is really a long term investment call. The idea is to be there in front of the potentially big earnings momentum in 2010 and 2011, when Mylan is launching new blockbuster generics and fully leveraging its leaner cost structure.

If spending is kept in check, free cash flow should grow nicely over that time and can really explode in 2011. The few bulls in the name talk about opportunities in biologics although that can be another significant growth driver post the patent expiration bolus in 2011; that's too far out and too uncertain to hang your hat on in my opinion.

The company is looking for mid to high single digit revenue growth for both 2009 and 2010 and if you conservatively extrapolate what the co. expects in terms of R&D investment and SG&A, you get to roughly 200 basis points of operating margin expansion in 09' vs. 08' and another 100 basis points in 2010. That translates into huge operating leverage as pre-tax earnings grow 40-50% in 09' and another 20% in 2010. If you assume a constant 34% tax rate, you can get to $1 in 2009 and $1.40 to $1.50 in 2010.

It's worth noting that management guides to a range of $0.90-$1.10 in 2009 and $1.50-$1.70 in 2010. So, good execution and a modicum of pipeline success can easily make EPS $1.50-$1.60 or more in 2010. If Mylan can do $1.50, I think its reasonable to expect a market multiple by year end 2010 (let's assume a conservative 12X's) and that gets you to $18. That's a double ladies and gents.

On the flip side, there's little reason to expect any less than 10 times on a $1.40 number if execution is solid, so the margin of safety is substantial. If on the other hand, estimates are topped and the number is closer to $1.60, investors are apt to get really excited and bid the multiple to 13 or 14, which would get you north of $20/share.

On a shorter term basis, I think a couple of marginal earnings beats can get this name 11 times the $1 expected in 2009. That would amount to a 20%+ gain from here in the next 6 months and the street would likely look to roll that target multiple forward to a $1.40ish number for 2010 – which would get you north of $15 a year from now.

So the net-net here is that you have a decent company in an out of favor sector and industry that has stumbled and appears to be regaining traction at a time when secular trends are poised to improve and mitigate cyclical pressures in the years ahead. Sentiment is bearish, management has a credibility issue and valuation at 9 times 2009 EPS reflects. Several things can go right in the next 2 years and MYL can standout as a margin and earnings growth story in a world where few exist. Estimates appear to have stabilized, expectations are positioned to bottom and valuation multiple have minimal risk in my view, IF Mylan can simply hit its targets.

Meanwhile, huge amounts of patent expirations in the industry, a record number of first to file opportunities and yet to be realized merger synergies are reasons to be optimistic that Mylan can deliver better results. Some might question its balance sheet as the company put a lot of debt on to pay for the Merck KG assets. Fair concern but the cash flow is relatively visible and stable and the interest expenses well covered in even a very bearish scenario for profitability in 2009 and 2010. Thus I think the debt service burden very manageable and if the balance sheet is delivered faster than expected, which is quite possible; it would add additional support to EPS growth in 2010.

The shares are well off their recent lows and thus apt to give a little back in the days ahead. So you have time to build a position by buying a little here and adding on any meaningful pullback. The recent trading action and very short run chart pattern seems to indicate that the shares may be under accumulation so I doubt a big pullback is coming. I'd expect pullback to find support in the $8.40 to $8.50 area and better support near $8. If your approach requires one, I'd suggest using stop at $7.80. If you can take a longer term view, I would look to buy a third here and third at $8 if it ever gets there and another third at $7 if that happened, all else was equal. At an average cost of $8, I think you'd be getting well compensated for the risk and would stand to do very well if anything went right.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Stock market trading model Update


The S&P Model sold the long at todays close and is now flat and in cash. This model will potentially get short at the close tomorrow November 26th, if the VIX low is greater than 60.25 during the day tomorrow.

The NASDAQ model is flat and in cash. This model will get short at the close tomorrow November 26th if the VXN stays above 59.51 during the day tomorrow or if the VXN closes above the VXN open tomorrow or if the VXN closes greater than 59.71

Pair Trades

The recent market turmoil has created significant opportunities in some closed end funds that track the major indices. If you aren’t already familiar, closed end funds trade like stocks, you can buy and sell them during market hours they have a fixed number of shares outstanding so the supply and demand forces of the market can cause closed end funds to trade at a premium or discount to the net asset value. Closed end funds usually have 3 lettered tickers. As a comparison an open end fund only trades at the closing price of the day and always trades at NAV, new shares are created or redeemed to meet the forces of supply and demand. Open end funds have 5 lettered tickers and always end in X.

Typically the closed end funds that track the major indices stay relatively close to their respective NAVs because they can be easily arbitraged as traders know what stocks are in the major indices.

As an example DPO is a closed end fund that tracks the Dow Jones , this funds is trading at a -13.5% discount to the NAV and paying 25.9% dividend yield paid monthly. This fund has historically traded at an avg -6% discount to NAV. To arbitrage this opportunity with a pair trade on a $100k investment.
Buy 9,608 shares of DPO @ 7.65 = $73,500
Buy 7 Jan 2010 105 strike DIA puts @ 27 = $18,900
Note that I bought deep in the money puts on the DIA which tracks the Dow Jones. If the Dow Jones goes down, my DIA puts will go up in value to offset the potential decline in DPO. I paid $27 for the puts that are $21.1 in the money, so Im paying $5.9 for the time value and downside protection. Don’t forget the DPO long position is paying me 25.9% annually which will pay for that time value premium. I have 14 months of downside protection until the puts expire on January 2010. DPO pays .1666/ share in divided monthly, so Ill earn $22,418 in divided income (9,608 shares * 14 months * .1666 ) I paid $5.9 for the puts * 7 contracts = $4,130 Assuming the discount to NAV doesn’t widen and DPO doesn’t cut the dividend and the market stays flat, Ill earn $22,418 less $4,130 paid for the puts = $18,288
If the market rallies Ill participate in the upside above 110.9 on the DIA + I will earn the $18,288 in dividends. If the market continues to decline I am protected in the downside and Ill earn the $18,288 in dividends.

Another example is to buy BEO which tracks the S&P 500, this fund ( BEO) sells covered call positions on the portfolio to pay a big 29.7% annual dividend, the dividend is paid semi annually. This fund is trading at a -10% discount to NAV. BEO has what is called a termination date, which means that on around 10/12/2010 this fund will be redeemed at NAV. To arbitrage this opportunity with a pair trade on a $100k investment, you can put on a similar married put trade as the (DPO/ DIA put) example above, but use SPY puts as the hedge for BEO long. Or you could buy BEO and hedge the position with an SDS long position. SDS is an ETF that tracks 2x the inverse of the S&P. If the S&P goes down SDS will go up by 2x the amount. So on a 100k investment Buy $64k worth of BEO and also buy $32k worth of SDS, collect the 29.7% annual dividend and participate in the 10% of upside in discount to NAV that will be made up on termination date.

Below is a table of some other CEFs that track the major indices. There are a ton of ways to skin this cat, please let me know if you have any other creative ideas.

Full disclosure, I have positions in DPO, BEO and RCC.


Monday, November 24, 2008

Breakout trade


I was doing some work on testing gaps and stumbled across something that I’d like to share. I was testing the idea of fading gaps after periods of tight consolidation. I ran a test on all the NASDAQ 100 stocks going back to 1990.
The original rules tested were:
The stock had to be above 5.
Buy when yesterdays 7 day Bollinger band width was in the bottom decile for a 100 day look back period and todays opening gap is 1ATR below yesterdays close then buy on a bullish range pivot. Exit longs on a bearish range pivot.
Enter short if yesterdays 7 day Bollinger band width was in the bottom decile for a 100 day look back period and todays opening gap is 1ATR above yesterdays close then Short on a bearish range pivot. Exit shorts on a bullish range pivot.
This idea made money but it didn’t give the edge I anticipated, so I took a look at trading in the same direction as the gap and the idea got a lot better.

The new Rules are:
The stock had to be above 5.
Buy when yesterdays 7 day Bollinger band width was in the bottom decile for a 100 day look back period and todays opening gap is 1ATR above yesterdays close then buy on a bullish range pivot. Exit longs on a bearish range pivot.
Enter short if yesterdays 7 day Bollinger band width was in the bottom decile for a 100 day look back period and todays opening gap was 1ATR below yesterdays close then Short on a bearish range pivot. Exit shorts on a bullish range pivot.

This strategy has a win rate of 51%, 277 wins out of 539 trades since 1990. There were, on average 29 trades per year and the average length of each trade was 2 days. 100 dollars would have grown to 7,800 dollars which is a return of 7,738% or 26% annualized with a maximum drawdown of -38%. The average winning trade made 4.4% and the average losing trade lost -2.7%. The biggest win was a gain of 30% and the biggest loss was -14%. See the performance results below
As a comparison a buy and hold in the Nasdaq 100 over the same period would have turned $100 into $255 for an annualized return of 5.25% with a maximum drawdown of -83%.

See break out trade part 2 and part 3 for further details and analysis.























Stock market trading model Update


Today was another 90+% upside day in volume, but I think the major indices may be due for a short term decline we are a little overbought and bumping up against decent volume at price overhead resistance.

The S&P Model is still long from the close of November 7th. This model will sell the long at tomorrows close , November 25th.

The NASDAQ model is flat and in cash. This model will get short at the close tomorrow November 25th if the VXN stays above 61.46 during the day tomorrow or if the VXN closes above the VXN open tomorrow or if the VXN closes greater than 62.92.

Sunday, November 23, 2008

S&P 500 a short term buy


The S&P Model is still long from the close of November 7th.

The NASDAQ model is flat and in cash.

If the S&P happens to have a big gap down on Monday below 757 my short term system has a trade that will get long at the open with 50 wins out of 50 occurrences. See performance results of this pattern above, results based on 1 contract trades since 1982.

Out of the 2 short term trades that have hit since we started this blog, we lost17 pts on November 18th, but made 52 pts on the win from October 28th Net, the short term system is up 32pts in 2 trades.

If Open < 757 Then Buy @ Mkt
Exit 1st profitable open or 2% stop loss

Trading exit strategy part 3

This is a follow up post to the exit trading strategy. I added a few more charts so you can compare the exits that had multiple variables tested and averaged.

To further examine the exits with multiple variables see the charts below. Each chart shows 2 markets, the S&P is on the left column and the long bond futures are on the right column of each chart. The exit technique is labeled at the top of the chart and I showed total net profit, winning percent and profit factor in that order from top to bottom of each chart.

Click to enlarge this chart of the Time based exit.
Click to enlarge this chart of the profit target as a percent exit.
Click to enlarge this chart of the ATR ratchet exit.

Click to enlarge this chart of the bearish range pivot exit.

Friday, November 21, 2008

Best asset allocation


When constructing a portfolio for a balance of maximum reward and minimum risk its best to find the asset classes that have a low correlation to each other.
“Every possible asset combination can be plotted in risk-return space, and the collection of all such possible portfolios defines a region in this space. The line along the upper edge of this region is known as the efficient frontier (sometimes "the Markowitz frontier"). Combinations along this line represent portfolios (explicitly excluding the risk-free alternative) for which there is lowest risk for a given level of return. Conversely, for a given amount of risk, the portfolio lying on the efficient frontier represents the combination offering the best possible return. Mathematically the Efficient Frontier is the intersection of the Set of Portfolios with Minimum Variance (MVS) and the Set of Portfolios with Maximum Return.” Wikipedia

Historically, since 1972 an optimal asset allocation mix for high returns and low risk, has been, 5% money market, 15% Bonds, 20% commodities, 20% emerging markets, 20% REITs, 20% small cap value. Since 1972 this asset allocation mix would have only had 4 negative return years ( 1974 -10.7%, 1990 -2.84%, 1994 -.15%, 1998 -11.71%)

Ideal Portfolio Allocation
Money Market - 5%
Total Bond Market - 15%
Commodities - 20%
Emerging Markets - 20%
REIT - 20%
Small Cap Value - 20%

Portfolio Stats since 1972
Average Return 14.82%
CAGR 14.29%
Standard Dev 10.89%
Correlation US 0.58

Below is a portfolio of mutual funds that have the highest historical Sharpe ratio in these asset classes. I couldn’t find a pure commodity fund so I used the SGGDX which invests in gold and gold stocks. I also had a hard time finding a pure REIT fund, so I chose CGMRX, this fund isn’t always invested in only REITS and is currently invested in some energy and commodity related stocks. The mutual fund portfolio below has averaged 18.36% from1999 to Jan 2008. YTD this fund portfolio would be down ~24% as of the end of October vs. -35% for the S&P.

5% - RMMXX - Money market
15%- BTTNX - bond fund
20%- CGMRX -CGM Realty fund
20%- SGGDX - gold fund/ commodities
20%- ODMAX -emerging markets
20%- WEMMX - small cap

Or you could use the ETFs below for an allocation mix.
5% - Money market
15%- PLW - bond fund
20%- ICF - REITs
20%- DBC - Commodities
20%- EEM -emerging markets
20%- IWN - small cap value

To reduce risk further you could also sell covered calls on these ETF positions ( ICF, DBC, EEM, IWN ) or better yet sell naked puts and keep the allocation in cash with the intention of buying the ETF if it gets put to you.
If you’d like a referral to a financial advisor whom is privy to these strategy’s, please send me an email. If you want to play around with different allocation combinations, this website has a very useful tool here.



Current market correction compared to others

Chart of the DayThe stock market continues in its highly volatile ways with the Dow trading down 5.5% on the day. For some perspective on the current correction, today's chart illustrates all major stock market corrections (15% loss or greater) of the last 108 years. Each dot represents a major correction as measured by the Dow. For example, the bear market that began in 1973 lasted 481 trading days and ended after the Dow declined 45%. Since 1900, the Dow has undergone a major correction 26 times or one major correction every 4.2 years. As it stands right now, the current stock market correction (October 2007 peak to most recent low which occurred today) would measure slightly below average in duration but above average in magnitude. In fact, of the 26 major stock market correction since 1900, the current stock market correction currently ranks as the fourth largest in magnitude (only the corrections beginning in 1906, 1929, and 1937 were greater) and is the most severe stock market correction of the post-World War II era.Notes:- Where's the market headed? The answer may surprise you. Find out right now with the exclusive & Barron's recommended charts of Chart of the Day Plus.

Thursday, November 20, 2008

McClellan Oscilator over sold Model update


The S&P Model is still long from the close of November 7th.

The NASDAQ model is flat and in cash.

The short term set up didn’t hit because the S&P futures didn’t get above the 825 stop entry level.

If you are lucky enough to be sitting on the sidelines in this market I think we are very close to getting an oversold bounce. Today the McClellan oscillator closed @ -320, the VIX is at record highs and the long bond was up 7 ½ points bringing the S&P dividend yield higher than the 10yr treasury and the Dow dividend yield higher than the 30yr treasury. Historically these conditions are very bullish for a market bounce.

Above is a performance report that shows how the S&P has performed 30 days after the McClellan Oscillator had closed below -250, 10 wins out of 12 occurrences and average trade of $12,000. As comparison a random 30 day period in the S&P 500 has been up 56% of the time for an average trade of $442.

Unfortunately my S&P model is already long the S&P at much higher levels. I am currently long the S&P with a small position but will add to that position tomorrow if the S&P puts in a bullish range pivot and rally’s 22 pts above the open on Friday November 21st

With this volatility Id keep your positions small and stops loose.

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Trading exit strategy part 2


This is a follow up post to yesterdays Trading Exit strategy. I forgot to test the bearish pivot and bearish range pivot as exits.

I’ve updated yesterdays post to include the 2 exit strategies and also tested all exits across a few more markets. Please see the update here.

S&P 500 a short term buy


The short term trade set up that I posted on yesterday didn’t hit because the S&P futures didn’t open below 842.

We are going to try and get long again tomorrow November 20th in the short term system .There is still a bullish pattern in the S&P backed by higher bond prices and a spike in the VIX If the S&P futures open below Tuesdays low then the market rallys back up to that low, buy @ 825. See performance results of this pattern , the results are based on 1 contract trades since 1982.

Out of the 2 short term trades that have hit, we lost17 pts on November 18th, but made 52 pts on the win from October 28th Net, the short term system is up 32pts in 2 trades.

For Thursday November 20th, in the S&P futures.
If the S&P 500 futures Open less than 825 then buy @ 825
Exit 1st profitable open or 2% stop loss

Stock market trading model Update


The S&P Model is still long from the close of November 7th.

The NASDAQ model is flat but will potentially get long at tomorrows close November 20th if during the day the VXN stays below 75.34 or if the VXN closes less than then 74.66 or if the VXN closes less than the VXN open .

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Trading exit strategy


For the most recent trading exit study visit our new site. http://www.ripetrade.com/2008/11/trading-exit-strategy.html


A lot of time is spent on teaching and learning, trade entries or how to get into a trade. I have seen very little attention to the more important question of exits, and how to get out of a trade. Getting into the trade is the easy part. The true skill comes into play with the exits. Knowing when to take a loss and when to hang on to your profits. “ Know when to hold them and know when to fold them”.

To compare some common profit taking exits and to determine which is the best general all around short term profit taking exit, I ran a series of back tests on the S&P 500 futures, long treasury bond, CRB index and dollar index, on data back to 1982, approximately 6,550 trading days. I want to compare only the profit taking exit, so for all examples, the entry will be the same ( buying on any random day) and the stop loss exit will be the same 2% stop loss.

The profit taking exits that I will test are:

Subscribe to RipeTrade, details here!

Time based- Exit the long position after a period of time. For example if I bought the S&P today and my time based exit was 3 trading days I would exit the long position on the open of Friday which is 3 trading days after entry. I tested 1 day through 10 day holding periods and averaged the results in the table below.

Target profit percent –This exit sells the position when a certain profit is attained. For example if I bought the S&P today @ 847 and the profit target was 2%, I would sell my long position when the S&P hit 864. I tested a range of profit targets of 1% through 4% and averaged the results in the table below.

Average true range ratchet – This is a profit taking mechanism that progressively ratchets up an increment of average true range multiplied by the amount of time added to the lowest low in the trade, this brings the stop closer and closer to the current price as time goes by. For the performance stats I tested 72 variables of ATR ratchet and averaged the results.

Bearish pivot - A bearish pivot is a day when todays high is less than the prior days high and todays low is less than the prior days low then exit market on close.

Bearish range pivot - A bearish range pivot day is when the stock or market declines an increment of the prior days range BELOW today’s opening price. For these examples I will use 30% of prior days range below the open. In the table below I show the performance statistics of a 30% bearish range pivot exit . I also tested a variety of range pivots from 5% to 100% of prior days range, in steps of 5% and averaged the results.

First profitable CLOSE – This profit taking exit sells the long position on the first profitable market CLOSE. For example if I bought the S&P futures today @ 847 and today the futures close above 847, I will sell and take my profit at today’s close . If today the S&P closes below 847 I will hold on to the position until the S&P closes above 847 or I get stopped out for a loss.

First profitable OPEN- I first heard about this exit from Larry Williams and a great primer to Larry’s work is one of my favorite books Long-Term Secrets to Short-Term Trading
. This profit taking exit sells the long position on the first profitable market OPEN. For example if I bought the S&P futures today @ 847 and tomorrow the futures OPEN above 847, I will sell and take my profit at the markets OPEN . If tomorrow the S&P opens below 847, I will hold on to the position until the S&P OPENs above 847 or I get stopped out for a loss.

Subscribe to RipeTrade, details here!

From the performance results you can see that the bearish range pivot outperforms all other exits in average trade size, total net profit, profit factor and $ per day ( avg trade/ time in trade). The 1st profitable exit outperforms all other exits in highest winning percent and comes in 2nd place for all other categories.
To further examine the exits with multiple variables see the charts here. Each chart shows 2 markets, the S&P is on the left column and the long bond futures are on the right column. The exit technique is labeled at the top of the chart and I show total net profit, winning percent and profit factor in that order from top to bottom.



Enter your email address:





Delivered by FeedBurner

S&P 500 a short term buy


The short term trade setup that I posted on yesterday was stopped out for the 2% loss today.

We are going to try and get long again tomorrow November 19th in the short term system .There is still a bullish pattern in the S&P backed by higher bond prices and a spike in the VIX. See performance results of this pattern.

Out of the 2 short term trades that have hit, we lost 17 pts today, but made 52 pts on the win from October 28th So the short term system is up 32pts in 2 trades.

For Wednesday November 19th
If The S&P 500 futures open < 842 Then Buy @ market
Exit 1st profitable open or 2% stop loss

Stock market trading model Update


The S&P Model is still long from the close of November 7th.

The NASDAQ model is flat and in cash.

Pre market gaps

Trading higher: CLF +5.8% (settled with ANR over terminated merger). On earnings: CNTF +16.8%, NM +11.5%, SRCL +2.5% (S&P 500 index reconstitution, BUD).

Trading lower: DIVX -11% (guidance), ANR -6.6% (settled with CLF over terminated merger), CV -5.8% (1.125M common share secondary), WFR -4.2% (guidance). On earnings: SCA -22.6%, XFML -17.6%, CTRP -10.8%.

Monday, November 17, 2008

ETF universe


This is a comprehensive list of all the ETF’s available, with a brief description, indices that they track, time they close and if there are options available. I spent a lot of time on this list and you wont find it anywhere else. I haven’t been able to figure out how to attach an excel file to the blog so if you want the whole list send me an email RipeTrade@gmail.com Ill send it over and you can keep it updated on your own. This is a screen shot of some of the names.

Want to know what to trade and when to trade? Click here


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

S&P 500 a short term buy

Todays short term setup didnt get long because the S&P futures didnt open below 845. Lets see if we can get long tomorrow, November 18th.
The current price pattern in the S&P 500, and spike in treasury bond prices still set up a bullish short term ( 1-3 day) scenario for tomorrow November 18th, if the S&P futures open below todays low then buy at that low. See performance results of this pattern below.The intermediate term (1-7 day) S&P 500 model is already long at higher prices so this short term setup is a nice confirmation.

If Open <847.5 then Buy @ 847.5
Exit on 1st profitable open or 2% stop loss.

Click on image to enlarge. Results based on 1 contract trades since 1982.

Stock market timing

Part 3
A fellow Ripe Trade reader asked if the 3 day RSI strategy works on the S&P and Dow Jones. As a follow up to the RSI strategy on the NASDAQ , to answer your question, yes it does work on the S&P ,and does work on the Dow Jones see results below.

Ripe Trade RSI Strategy for the Dow Jones industrial average
Buy market on close if the 3 day RSI on the Dow Jones closes <15
Sell market on close when the 3 day RSI on the Dow Jones closes > 60

Since1995 this strategy would have turned $100 dollars into $212, as a comparison the same $100 dollars would be worth $219 in a buy and hold approach, don’t forget this strategy is only invested less than 1/5 of the year. This strategy suffered a maximum drawdown of -15% versus a -40% maximum drawdown with a buy and hold approach in the S&P 500. This strategy slightly underperforms buy and hold but has only experienced a small fraction of the drawdown risk. The strategy has averaged 5.5% CAGR since 1995, compared to a buy and hold approach which would have only yielded 5.72% average annual return over the same period. 80 out of the 107 trades have been winners, for an 74.8% batting average. The average trade returned .73%, winning trades averaged 1.79% and losing trades averaged -2.46% The returns don’t account for commission, slippage or any interest that would have been earned during the 83% of all trading days that the strategy is sitting safely out of the market earning interest.

FYI, if you have signed up for the email service, please continue to check this website for updates. I had some trouble getting feedburner set up correctly. Send me an email RipeTrade@gmail.com if you have any issues to report. Thanks.

Sunday, November 16, 2008

S&P 500 a short term buy

The current price pattern in the S&P 500, and spike in treasury bond prices set up a bullish short term ( 1-3 day) scenario if the S&P futures have a big gap down on Monday November 17th below 845 then rally through 845. See performance results of this pattern below.
The intermediate term (1-7 day) S&P 500 model is already long at higher prices so this short term setup is a nice confirmation.

If Open <845 then Buy @ 845
Exit on 1st profitable open or 2% stop loss.

Click on image to enlarge. Results based on 1 contract trades since 1982.

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Stock market timing

A fellow Ripe Trade reader asked if the 3 day RSI strategy works on the S&P and Dow Jones. As a follow up to the RSI strategy on the NASDAQ , to answer your question, yes it does work on the S&P see results below. I will do another post in the days to come on the 3 day RSI in the Dow Jones

Ripe Trade RSI Strategy for the S&P 500

Buy market on close if the 3 day RSI on the S&P closes <15
Sell market on close when the 3 day RSI on the S&P closes > 60

Since1995 this strategy would have turned $100 dollars into $216, as a comparison the same $100 dollars would only be worth $168 in a buy and hold approach. This strategy suffered a maximum drawdown of -16% versus a -44% maximum drawdown with a buy and hold approach in the S&P 500. This strategy outperforms buy and has only experienced a small fraction of the drawdown risk. The strategy has averaged 5.72% CAGR since 1995 which beats a buy and hold approach which would have only yielded 3.82% average annual return over the same period. 79 out of the 107 trades have been winners, for an 73.8% batting average. The average trade returned .75%, winning trades averaged 1.92% and losing trades averaged -2.6% The returns don’t account for commission, slippage or any interest that would have been earned during the 83% of all trading days that the strategy is sitting safely out of the market earning interest.

FYI, if you have signed up for the email service, please continue to check this website for updates. I had some trouble getting feedburner set up correctly. Send me an email
RipeTrade@gmail.com if you have any issues to report. Thanks.


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Friday, November 14, 2008

Pre market update

Trading higher: HPC +4.8% (ASH completes purchase), C +3.5% (insider buying).
On earnings: RZ +12.7%, MTSC +7.4%, MSCC +4.4%.


Trading lower: LHO -7.8% (rescinds prior outook), SLH -7.4% (7M share secondary), ASH -6.5% (closes acquisition of HPC), HOLX -4.7% (Cervista results), WYNN -3.1% (5M share secondary).

On earnings: CLNE -6.3%, JWN -5.4%, KSS -4.8%.

Hologic (HOLX) A top stock pick

Hologic (HOLX): A top stock pick in Healthcare for 2009? by Allen Phatimer a Ripe Trade contributor.

A quest for value and alpha in well financed, well managed defensive names with solid visibility, reasonable growth prospects and discount valuation leads me to digital mammography and Pap test leader Hologic. The shares are off to historical trough multiples at significant discounts to what appear to be lesser peers. But with a solid quarter, reset and achievable expectation and a call that detailed how upside to 09' expectations is probable; I cant help but think about what can go right at this juncture.

The shares have been in a slide for the better part of a year in reaction to a major acquisition (Cytec) which looked suboptimal and expensive initially and proved naysayer right when the sales growth of the acquired product portfolio slowed profitability suffered and investors began to aggressively discount the expected sales and margin benefits the co. did the Cytec deal for in the first place. And then came the currency headwind. And then a sales miss. And did I mention the push out of a new sales and margin driving product?

Needless to say, the bears were vindicated and burden of proof shifted directly to management's ability to execute on improving acquired sales growth and new product commercialization which looked increasingly difficult in the face of mounting macro and industry specific headwinds. Understandably, long time longs threw in the towel, shorts pressed their positions and the share price has gotten pummeled. What's the point you ask?

To make a short story long, I think HOLX shares might now represent the kind of relative value associated with a stock with reasonable growth prospects and margin expansion opportunity in a world where few can grow or hold margins.

Sales were better than expected on strong organic unit sales growth. The company's breast health sales were solid, orders were strong and management was somewhat optimistic about a rebound in acquired product sales. Gross Margin dollars were higher and operating expenses lower so operating income topped expectations. EPS was in-line.

Breast Health of sales of $221M were up 25%; guidance is for 5% in FY09', Diagnostics revenue of $133.7M was up 11% y/y; guidance is for 15-16% growth in FY09', and GYN/Surgical (which is essentially NovaSure) sales of $59.7M were up 2%; but that's an improvement from the last couple of quarters and management is looking for 17-18% growth in FY09' in that division. Management's new FY09 guidance is for 9-10% sales growth to $1.82-1.85B and non-GAAP EPS of $1.22-1.44.

All in all a solid quarter with excellent unit growth in profit driving digital mammo, steady Pap test sales and a rebound in Novasure (key products acquired from Cytec). And management lowered guidance to account for recession worsening, credit tightness, currency pressure, and slightly negative mix. Management removed any considerations for new product sales. And that only lowered numbers slightly – much less I think, than was feared. Exactly what you needed to see, in my opinion, in order to begin to exit the show me stock status Hologic earned.

It appears that the share price (at roughly 11 times forward earnings) discounts a substantially worse unit growth and pricing pressure in key cash flow drivers than management or most analysts do with no help from new products – i.e. what amounts to a worst case scenario. So risk (in the company specific sense) with respect to earnings and multiple appears relatively low if can make it's numbers because the unusually low multiple should hold provided the market doesn't continue to slide hard.

One might also think that risk (in a margin of safety sense) is relatively low if valuation on cash flow, margin potential and returns of such franchises as Hologic's is low – as I believe it is. One might also conclude that a company that considers pressure on unit sales growth and margins that they are yet to realize, and omits likely incrementals in its guidance is being very conservative and thus risk to their estimates is low so that sort of risk appears to be relatively low.

Management considers the macro pressure (which they still say they haven't seen) and no new product contribution in the $1.22 guidance, when there is a high likelihood of additional revenue streams ramping by year end 2009, and 9% revenue growth that is fairly visible (strong order growth, and substantial backlog) and stable margins that can expand as sales growth accelerates. Management seems confident that digital mammography unit sales would be up in 09' vs. 08'. They admitted average selling prices might be under slight pressure but suggested that the guidance took that into consideration. I can't help but wonder is management is more bullish than they let on about unit sales.

Another interesting thing about this situation is that cash flow appears to be resilient in the face some level of the aforementioned macro headwinds, while the company has a few significant growth drivers and cost save opportunities (like the new products and ramping utilization in a new low cost facility or synergy from integrating Cytec). Thus you might think that adds more flexibility to meet numbers.

So as the market grows (however slowly) and penetration increases, revenue growth can accelerate and margins can increase a couple of hundred basis points by year end 2010. The 1.22 can be 1.30 (if anything goes right) which might get a 12 multiple (~$17), and 15% growth rate in 2010 can get you to 1.50 for 2010 and could be as high as 1.60-1.70 on such faster, higher margin sales growth and a little operating leverage. And that 1.65 might garner a 14-15 time multiple (when the co. is beating estimates and raising guidance) and that might get you to $23-$25 12-18 months out. If anyone knows how wrong I am, please do tell.

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Stock market trading model Update

The NASDAQ model covered the short from October 29th at the 1202 stop, locking in a 7% profit. This system is now out of the market and flat.

The S&P Model is still long from the close of November 7th

The NASDAQ RSI trade I posted on yesterday is off to a nice start, up 6.5% today.

Stock Market Declines


Markets go up after being down. At the recent market low, the S&P 500 was down 29% from the month prior. This was quite a rare occurrence, since 1982 the S&P 500 had only been down by a greater amount once, which was the crash of 1987. One month after that 1987 decline the S&P 500 had rallied 10% higher. As a general rule the steeper the market declines in a short period of time, the higher the likelihood of a bounce higher. I ran a back test to show that when the market declines more, the probability of a bounce increases and so does the average trade size, when exiting 1 month later. The test was conducted on data going back to 1982 which covers 6,552 trading days. The bottom X axis shows the 1 month percentage change in the S&P 500 ranging from -40% to +40%. You can see steeper the 1 month decline is the higher the average trade, higher the win % , higher the profit factor and lower the draw down has been when exiting 1 month later.

If the stock market declined more than -10% it was higher 67% of the time 1 month later and the average trade was $1,265 in 1 S&P futures contract. If the market was up more than 10% in a 1 month period it went higher only 59% of the time and the average trade was only $740 almost half the amount compared to the 1 month periods after a steep decline.

Good market commentary

“The market is nearly always advancing strongly by the time that the recession has three months to go. This echoes Warren Buffett's remark a few weeks ago – “if you wait for the robins, the spring will be over.” Buffett isn't buying because he's confident that the recession has less than 6 months to go. He's buying because he finds stocks worth buying. Stocks can have very mixed performance over the course of a recession, but they almost always advance strongly before it ends. “

The newest Hussman commentary is available
here.

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Stock market trading model Update


The NASDAQ model remains Short from the October 29th entry. This system will exit the short position and get flat @1202 stop in the NASDAQ futures. In other words if the NASDAQ futures open above 1202 this model will close the short position at the open. If the NDX futures open below 1202 the model will stay short until the NASDAQ rises up to 1202..

The S&P Model is long from the close of November 7th.

NASDAQ RSI strategy

I think the markets are getting very close to an oversold bounce, the oscillators are oversold, VIX overbought, bond prices have spiked , the McClellan Oscillator is getting oversold and don’t forget the seasonal sweet spot for thanksgiving day is to buy tomorrow. Below are the details of a simple strategy to get long the NASDAQ 100 ( aka NDX, QQQQ, QLD, ND futures) Historically a good spot to expect bounces in the NASDAQ 100 is when the 3 day RSI closes below 15. Today the 3 day RSI on the NDX closed @ 11

For an update and video on this strategy click here.

Ripe Trade RSI Strategy
Buy market on close if the 3 day RSI on the NDX closes <15
Sell market on close when the 3 day RSI on the NDX closes > 60


Since1995 this strategy would have turned $100 dollars into $1,434, as a comparison the same $100 dollars would only be worth $318 in a buy and hold approach. This strategy suffered a maximum drawdown of -17% versus a -80% maximum drawdown with a buy and hold approach in the NASDAQ 100. This strategy outperforms buy and hold by 4.5 fold and has only experienced a small fraction of the drawdown risk. The strategy has averaged 20% CAGR since 1995 which trounces a buy and hold approach which would have only yielded a paltry 8.25% average annual return over the same period. 104 out of the 126 trades have been winners, for an 82.5% batting average. The average trade returned 2.25%, winning trades averaged 3.27% and losing trades averaged -2.67% The returns don’t account for commission, slippage or any interest that would have been earned during the 83% of all trading days that the strategy is sitting safely out of the market earning interest.

Subscribe to RipeTrade, details here!

Subscribe to RipeTrade, details here!

Subscribe to RipeTrade, details here!


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

A few interesting news stories



Pre market update

Trading higher:
ME +5% (to replace CEPH in S&P MidCap 400), CEPH +3.9% (to replace GGP in S&P 500).
On earnings: OCNF +13.3%, CNQR +11.8%, MELI +7.4%, PBR +1.4%.

Trading lower:
GGP -18.2% (follow-through), AKS -3.3% (idles certain ops), HOLX -6%, LVS -2.8% (follow-through), PRU -2.2% (cuts dividend to $0.58 from $1.15).
On earnings: NTY -16.4%, IPI -13.1%, BOBE -9.9%.

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Performance Report


A trading system performance report quantifies how a trading system has performed over a given period of time. It’s a way to evaluate the risk, reward and expectancy of a trading method.
I have shown a number of performance reports and used a number of terms that may be unfamiliar to some. Performance reports are used to measure trading strategies in stocks, bonds, stock markets ,currencies and commodities. Below is a glossary of some of the most common terms in a performance report, with a brief explanation of how I like to use the measurement.

Total Net Profit: Is simply the total amount of money made or lost from a strategy from the beginning of trading to the last date tested. Total Net Profit is the account balance after all the trades have been made. A positive number indicates a positive expectancy and means that you have made money. A negative number means that the strategy has lost money, and the strategy should be reconsidered.

Total Trades: The total number of trades the strategy made.

Average Trade: The average trade is calculated using the Net Profits(loss) and dividing by the total number or trades made. A higher average is preferred and indicates that the strategy balances wins and losses to your favor. To normalize systems, I like to divide the average trade by avg # of days in a trade when comparing strategies, this will show what the average 1 day performance is and can be easily compared across systems trading the same market.

Avg # of Bars in Trade: This number shows the average duration of all winning and losing trades in terms of quantity of days in a trade. I like systems that have high average trades and low avg # of bars in trade.

Average Trades per Year: Using the total trades divided by the number of years the strategy was tested, results in this value.

Max Closed-Out Drawdown: The drawdown represents a maximum peak to trough drawdown based on closing prices. This number is an important risk measurement. The lower the Max closed out drawdown the better a system and more linear the equity curve. To normalize systems I like to divide the total net profit by max closed out drawdown.

Current Streak: Provides the number of most recent trade wins or losses. For example 2 winning trades in a row.


Profit Factor($Wins/$Losses): This is one of the most important performance measurements. Profit Factor gives the ratio of gross profit compared to gross loss. Having a profit factor greater than 1.00 signifies the system makes money and there is more gross profit than gross loss. Systems that have a profit factor over 2 are very good and have made 2 times more money in profits than they have lost.

Winning Percentage: This displays the percentage of time that the strategy made a profitable trade. The value can be misleading and other factors should be used in evaluating the strategy. The reason I like strategies that have a high win rate is because they are easier to trade emotionally.

Payout Ratio(Avg Win/Los): By dividing the average win by the average loss we can see if the average win is larger than the average loss.

Z-Score (W/L Predictability): This value is calculated to show the strategy’s tendency to win or lose in streaks. This number measure statistical significance.


Percent in the Market: Represents the percentage of time during the trading year in which there is an open position.

Max Intraday Drawdown: Unlike closed-out drawdown, this value indicates the drawdown during the trading day. The account would need to be able to sustain this loss in order to remain profitable. This number is an important risk measurement. The lower the Max closed out drawdown the better a system and more linear the equity curve. To normalize systems I like to divide the total net profit by max closed out drawdown.

Stock market trading model Update


The NASDAQ model remains Short from the October 29th entry. This system will exit the short position and get flat @1216 stop in the NASDAQ futures. In other words if the NASDAQ futures open above 1216 this model will close the short position at the open. If the NDX futures open below 1216 the model will stay short until the NASDAQ rises up to 1216.

The S&P Model is long from the close of November 7th. The short term setup I posted yesterday never got long. I forgot the bond market was closed today.

Thank you veterans and active troops

To all of you veterans who have served and to the troops that are serving, thank you for the valiant service of defending our country.



Monday, November 10, 2008

S&P a short term buy

The current price pattern in the S&P 500, inside day on Friday and spike in treasury bond prices set up a bullish short term ( 1-3 day) scenario if the long bond opens higher than today’s 117 20.5/32 close and then the S&P 500 rally’s 5.5 pts above the open tomorrow November 11th.
The intermediate term (1-7 day) S&P 500 model is already long at higher prices so this short term setup is a nice confirmation.

If TQ futures open > 117 20.5/32 Then Buy @ Open + 5.5 points
Exit 1st profitable open or 2% stop loss.


Click on image to enlarge

Stock market trading model Update


The NASDAQ model remains Short from the October 29th entry with a stop loss on the NASDAQ futures @ 1395.

The S&P Model is long from the close of November 7th.

Home prices to decline another 20%

Housing prices have already declined 20% nationally and as much as -36% in Phoenix AZ, -36% in Las Vegas NV and -35% in Miami FL. These declines may just be the tip of the iceberg. Loose lending standards have caused a severe real estate bubble causing U.S. home prices to increase nearly 150% inflation adjusted from 1995 to 2005. The US real estate market had a much greater inflation adjusted appreciation than Japans housing boom during the 80’s, and Japans market is still in a decline.

According to the Case-Shiller futures contract they are forecasting a larger decline in residential real estate. The Case-Shiller futures forecast a 34% peak to trough decline in residential real estate prices. Currently, the home price index has only declined 20% from peak to trough, which leaves an additional 14% of downside based on the futures price.

To clarify the Case-Shiller Home Price Index measures the residential housing market, tracking changes in the value of the residential real estate market in 20 metropolitan regions across the United States. The Case- Schiller futures are contracts that trade to forecast the future value of the Case- Schiller index.

Reasons why residential real estate may decline another 20%.
1) Case- Shiller futures predict a further decline in home prices. I’m a big believer in using markets to predict the future. The collective wisdom of a crowd is much more accurate than an expert at predictions. Also when money is on the line, it gives you a lot of incentive to do your home work and make smart bets. Therefore I believe the futures market are a terrific barometer of things to come.
2) Loan delinquency rates and foreclosure rates are on the rise. According to the Standard & Poor’s residential real estate indicators delinquency rates for all loans increased from 6.35% in Q1 2008 to 6.41% in Q2 2008 and sub prime delinquency rates of 18.67% in Q2 2008. Foreclosures hit 1.19% in 2nd Q 2008 up from .99% in Q1 2008 with a foreclosure rate of 4.7% for sub prime in 2Q 2008. And inventory levels continue to rise.
3) The Japanese real estate market increased 100% from 1980 to 1990, Japans housing prices are still in a decline and currently down around 40% from the high. See pic below. As a comparison the US house prices increased almost 150% in 10 years and are just 2 years and 20% into the decline.
4) According to the U.S. Census Bureau data, the home ownership rate is starting to decline. Currently the home ownership rate is at 67.8% which is down from the 2005 peak of 69% home ownership. However the home ownership rate is still very high compared to the 64% average home ownership rate from 1985 to 2000. That 5% differential (69% peak-64% average) represents home owners who would not have qualified for mortgages prior to 1994, when lending standards were eased and are largely characterized as Sub prime. I think home ownership rates will revert to the mean and get closer to the historical 64% average ownership rate.
5) Tight credit. The Federal reserve board loan officers survey, indicates increasingly tightened standards for residential mortgages, credit card loans and commercial & industrial loans. Asset backed security’s and Mortgage backed security’s issuance has fallen off a cliff. In October debt issuance in the US was down more than 89% YOY and at its lowest levels in the past 13 years. There are still a several billion dollars in auction rate securities that have been frozen for over six months.
6) It is still much cheaper to rent than it is to own, at least where I live.
7) The unemployment rate is up over 40% year on year and with all the big bankruptcy’s and layoffs the unemployment rate is headed much higher.

For the reasons mentioned above I think housing prices have another 20% of downside risk. Even though the futures market suggest housing prices will only come down another 14% this would bring the median price of a home to near the same level of 2002-2003. One can easily argue that the current state of the economy is much more dire, than the environment of 2002-2003 which saw all time new high levels of liquidity and home ownership rates on the rise. Bubble markets get overbought from greed on the way up and they almost always end with over selling from fear on the way down.